HOME ISN’T NECESSARILY WHERE THE PLAINTIFF IS: DAIMLER AG V. BAUMAN AND ITS EFFECT ON GENERAL JURISDICTION

As every attorney can recall, one of the most frustrating aspects of 1L year revolves around the Court’s legal peregrinations beginning in Pennoyer and ending in International Shoe, after which the Court’s personal jurisdiction jurisprudence divided into two paths. Why do casebooks begin with Pennoyer when they could just start at International Shoe? Read more